I'm using maven 3.x and it builds fine. I'd suggest you to move to maven 3.x.
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Aleksander Slominski <[email protected]>wrote: > It is the latest maven package in Ubuntu - do you think that I should use > maven 3.x instead? > > Thanks, > > Alek > > aslom@l7:~/Apache/airavata-trunk$ mvn --version > Apache Maven 2.2.1 (rdebian-1) > Java version: 1.6.0_20 > Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre > Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 > OS name: "linux" version: "2.6.32-33-generic" arch: "amd64" Family: "unix" > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Hi Alek, > > > > Airavata will not get compiled with Java 1.3. Please use Java 1.5 or > higher > > version ! As far as I can see you are using 1.3. > > > > Lahiru > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Aleksander Slominski <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > what are the command line options you use to compile? is it the same as > > in > > > http://incubator.apache.org/airavata/build.html ? U have all kind of > > > strange > > > errors ... tested with svn updated to revision 1161613. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Alek > > > > > > ... > > > A modules/workflow-interpreter/src/main/resources/services.xml > > > A modules/workflow-interpreter/pom.xml > > > A modules/workflow-interpreter/client > > > A pom.xml > > > Updated to revision 1161613. > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > /home/aslom/Apache/airavata-trunk/modules/gfac-core/src/main/java/org/apache/airavata/core/gfac/extension/ExitableChain.java:[27,49] > > > generics are not supported in -source 1.3 > > > (use -source 5 or higher to enable generics) > > > public abstract class ExitableChain extends Chain<ExitableChain> { > > > > > > > > > [INFO] > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > [INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch > > > [INFO] > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > [INFO] Total time: 2 minutes 6 seconds > > > [INFO] Finished at: Thu Aug 25 13:54:59 EDT 2011 > > > [INFO] Final Memory: 50M/121M > > > [INFO] > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 4:11 PM, [email protected] < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Fixed > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Raminderjeet Singh < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I can again see some test failure for gfac-core. Can someone please > > > look > > > > > into this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [main] INFO impl.PropertiesBasedServiceImpl - > > > > > > Scheduler:org.apache.airavata.core.gfac.scheduler.impl.SchedulerImpl > > is > > > > > loaded > > > > > java.lang.NullPointerException > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.airavata.core.gfac.scheduler.impl.SchedulerImpl.schedule(SchedulerImpl.java:51) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.airavata.core.gfac.services.impl.AbstractSimpleService.execute(AbstractSimpleService.java:58) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.airavata.core.gfac.services.impl.PropertiesBasedServiceImplTest.testExecute(PropertiesBasedServiceImplTest.java:140) > > > > > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native > Method) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) > > > > > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:76) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50) > > > > > at > org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193) > > > > > at > > > org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52) > > > > > at > > > > org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191) > > > > > at > > > org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42) > > > > > at > > > > org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184) > > > > > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:35) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:115) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:97) > > > > > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native > Method) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) > > > > > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ClassLoaderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:103) > > > > > at $Proxy0.invoke(Unknown Source) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.invokeProvider(SurefireStarter.java:150) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireStarter.java:91) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:69) > > > > > Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: > 7.765 > > > sec > > > > > <<< FAILURE! > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > Raminder > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 19, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Heshan Suriyaarachchi wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake < > > > [email protected] > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> Fixed the issue ! Please take an svn update in gfac-core and > build > > > > again > > > > > ! > > > > > >> > > > > > > Now all the tests pass without an issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Thanks Heshan for pointing this out. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Regards > > > > > >> Lahiru > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake < > > > > [email protected] > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> Hi Patnachai, > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> We need to commit this default setup in to SVN which will fix > the > > > > build > > > > > >>> error. Later on when users configure the setup we can provide a > > > > > document > > > > > >> how > > > > > >>> to edit the service.properties file. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Regards > > > > > >>> Lahiru > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:43 PM, [email protected] < > > > > > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>> Hello Heshan, > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Thank you for interesting in Airavata. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Yes, you need to setup jackrabbit on your machine to pass the > > test > > > > at > > > > > >> the > > > > > >>>> current code. > > > > > >>>> However, the default configuration for test cases should use > > > > in-memory > > > > > >>>> database instead of persistent one. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Could you submit a JIRA ticket for the issue? > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> For workaround without a jackrabbit binary, you need to change > > > > > >>>> modules/gfac-core/src/test/resources/service.properties from > > > > > >>>> airavata/trunk. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> comment these 2 lines: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > jcr.class=org.apache.jackrabbit.rmi.repository.RmiRepositoryFactory > > > > > >>>> org.apache.jackrabbit.repository.uri= > http://localhost:8080/rmi > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> and uncomment this line: > > > > > >>>> #jcr.class=org.apache.jackrabbit.core.RepositoryFactoryImpl > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Heshan Suriyaarachchi < > > > > > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> Hi Devs, > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> I checked out and built the Airavata trunk successfully > without > > > > > tests. > > > > > >>>> But > > > > > >>>>> when I ran the build with tests, I can see test failures. I > am > > > > > getting > > > > > >> a > > > > > >>>>> test failure in > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.airavata.core.gfac.services.impl.PropertiesBasedServiceImplTest. > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> I had a look at the test and I'm guessing I need to setup > > > > jackrabbit > > > > > >> in > > > > > >>>> my > > > > > >>>>> machine inorder for this test to be successful. I am new to > > this > > > > > >> project > > > > > >>>>> and > > > > > >>>>> please correct me if I am wrong. > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> If so what are the other third party projects that is used by > > > > > >> airavata? > > > > > >>>> It > > > > > >>>>> will help me to set them up locally and see. > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> -- > > > > > >>>>> Regards, > > > > > >>>>> Heshan Suriyaarachchi > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> http://heshans.blogspot.com/ > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> -- > > > > > >>>> Best Regards, > > > > > >>>> Patanachai Tangchaisin > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> -- > > > > > >>> System Analyst Programmer > > > > > >>> PTI Lab > > > > > >>> Indiana University > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> -- > > > > > >> System Analyst Programmer > > > > > >> PTI Lab > > > > > >> Indiana University > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Heshan Suriyaarachchi > > > > > > > > > > > > http://heshans.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Patanachai Tangchaisin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > System Analyst Programmer > > PTI Lab > > Indiana University > > > -- Regards, Heshan Suriyaarachchi http://heshans.blogspot.com/
