Scott Sanders wrote:
>
> Should I start to create a workspace/project DTD? I
> think I am starting to have some understanding of
> the XML format, and it might be good for more people
> to not have to go through that ;-)
Not a bad idea, but don't be surprised if it changes significantly when
this code is merged with alexandria.
> Are the projects that are listed on the status pages
> only project that have a cvs and/or a ant/script
> element? For instance, you don't show ejb or jndi.
Those that appear on the cvs_index page are those that have a cvs tag.
Those that appear on the build page are those that have either an ant or
script tag.
> Also, any problems with me adding the necessary code
> to be able to distribute the jars that GUMP builds
> from those status pages? My intent is to try and start
> the CJAN type thing, and I think this is a good start ;-)
My preference would be that distribute be a separate step from build or
update.
> What do you guys think of CoffeeBar as a name?
For what?
> Any problems with me moving some stuff around? For
> example, in the jakarta-ant.xml, the cvs tag was in
> the master project. My ant-based system does not
> separate the cvs get from the actual build, so I had
> to move the cvs tag into the bootstrap-ant project,
> as that is the first one to execute. Comments
> appreciated.
I do prefer having the cvs being separate. My guess is that once you start
using this system, you will too. I frequently build individual projects
(actually, that's how I do development), and sometimes will update
individual projects to pick up a change.
I do have a problem with people having to know the order. Take a look in
particular at xml-xalan.xml. Or xml-site.xml.
- Sam Ruby
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
