>>So, how about it? It there any hope of adopting a common set of
>>project definitions, independent of the "engine" that drives the
>>process?
>
> I don't see we have any choice, either that or we go home (oh I am
> already ;-) )
I am in agreement. I see no reason in creating n different definitions. A
common schema will be very helpful, and I am willing to help.
Jeff, I intend to seriously start looking at Alexandria before I do much
more. I do apologize for not looking before, but Sam showed me Gump first,
and then all of the sudden I had a huge itch to scratch ;-)
Scott
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
