I think we have a general consensus on build.xml standardization, should we throw up some docs and make it available via the web site? Or should we go through the Jakarta General list first?
Daniel Rall wrote: > > Berin Loritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > John Morrison wrote: > > > > >> I think there are a lot of things that still need to be recommended > >> (including the indenting ;). How about starting a list of things? There a > >> few I added wrt the javadocs, but I'm not entirely sure I've picked the > >> right names or everything that's required... > > > > As to indents, for XML docs I find that 2 spaces is a nice natural indentation > > level. It's enough to visibly line up the beginning and end tags, and not so > > much that it makes the XML hard to read. > > I also am very happy with a 2 character indent for XML documents. An > additional benefit is that the width of the lines doesn't grow as > quickly as with a larger indent size. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
