Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On 10/11/01 3:41 PM, "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Berin Loritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 
>>> I think we have a general consensus on build.xml standardization, should we
>>> throw up some docs and make it available via the web site?  Or should we go
>>> through the Jakarta General list first?
>> 
>> Make it available on the web site, clearly marked as a "proposed".  It
>> would then behoove us to submit a short proposal to general@ (which
>> links to the published reference build.xml).  Jason, did you ever get
>> your hands on an old proposal to use as a template for BCEL?
>
> Yup, I'm using a template that Ted provided me with.

Does the build.xml standardization need to go through the same
proposal process, or does Berin's original messages to general@
qualify?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to