Facinating thread. Sorry I missed most of it... as I was on the road. Anyway...contrary to some of the statements here, see
http://jakarta.apache.org/gump/faq.html#10 In my ideal world, there would be declarative elements in the build.xml files themselves (not separate project descriptors) that could be used to determine the correct dependencies. I do believe that it is important to keep on top of cross project dependencies. Not just weekly or so, but nearly continuously. My experience is that if you let go for a while that it becomes harder and harder to catch up. This being said, I do welcome the thought of others testing other combinations. See http://jakarta.apache.org/gump/faq.html#7 Finally, I do believe that even with separate project descriptors, the current gump approach can scale - if more people contribute patches to projects that they care about and become committers themselves. As this is now happening, I was wondering if it was time to revisit http://jakarta.apache.org/gump/faq.html#11 - Sam Ruby -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
