On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 19:24, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Facinating thread.  Sorry I missed most of it... as I was on the road.
> Anyway...contrary to some of the statements here, see
> 
>    http://jakarta.apache.org/gump/faq.html#10
> 
> In my ideal world, there would be declarative elements in the build.xml
> files themselves (not separate project descriptors) that could be used to
> determine the correct dependencies.

If I remember correctly you heartily agreed that the dependencies should
be stored outside of the build file, this was about a week ago on either
this list or the turbine list. How might your declarative elements look
in your ideal build file? 
 
> I do believe that it is important to keep on top of cross project
> dependencies. 

I suppose it's merely a dispute over frequency. I occasionally, say
every two weeks, do something like a Gump build to eyeball things. 

> Not just weekly or so, but nearly continuously.  My
> experience is that if you let go for a while that it becomes harder and
> harder to catch up.  This being said, I do welcome the thought of others
> testing other combinations.  See
> 
>    http://jakarta.apache.org/gump/faq.html#7
> 
> Finally, I do believe that even with separate project descriptors, the
> current gump approach can scale - if more people contribute patches to
> projects that they care about and become committers themselves.  As this is
> now happening, I was wondering if it was time to revisit
> 
>    http://jakarta.apache.org/gump/faq.html#11

If this is for a general alexandria replacement then I would also like
to share my enthusiasm and place Maven up on the block as well. I
believe Scott has a tool as well. Or maybe we can combine our efforts
now that Scott and I have something to show and contribute.

> - Sam Ruby
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- 
jvz.

Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://tambora.zenplex.org


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to