Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
First, this was tried before, and failed. What makes you more optimistic this time? The reason I continue to be pessimistic that this move will not make a difference is that there is nothing wrong with the descriptor. The build.xml files that are the problem are *ALREADY* the in the cvs repository owned by the "responsible" organization.
MHO is that it part of a responsibility issue. In my organization when things fail I move the responsability to those that can really influence the thing. The fact that the descriptor is not the cause is not IMHO the point. It's also quite possible that I'm wrong though.
The plan was to move all these descriptors to a place where *everybody* could update them.
We are waiting... (whistle-tune)
LOL!
Done. I was planning to do this at the new years. ;-) HAPPY NEW YEARS! - Sam Ruby -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
