Do they teach 'soul' in Engineering?  I think not  :-) Even if you wanted
to, where would you start?

Beatle
Oz

-----Original Message-----
From: John Brase [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Sunday, 17 July 2011 3:19 AM
To: Richard C. Wagner
Cc: The Baylys; 'Alfa Digest'; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [alfa] Re: Is this an Alfa?

Well, that is a keeper. Thanks Richard.

John Brase
Indiana, USA

On 7/16/2011 12:02 PM, Richard C. Wagner wrote:
>
> And I think what I'm saying is that it's the *spirit* and *soul*  that 
> makes a car an Alfa.  Alfas have possessed a recognizable soul since 
> the early days.  I don't know if any of us could quantify it or even 
> fully qualify it, but when presented with a car, we might look at it 
> and say, "That's an Alfa."  We might even look at a car and say, 
> "That's done just like an Alfa. If I didn't know better, I would have 
> thought that IS an Alfa."
>
> I think, surely, the heart of any Alfa is its engine.  I've done 
> engine design for a living.  I've developed one of the only software 
> engine design packages available.  And every Alfa engine design I've 
> seen, including the flat-fours, including the V-6s, is beautiful.  The 
> designs are well thought out, with creative and elegant solutions to 
> many of the problems that are encountered when designing such a 
> mechanism.  (Ever look at the Alfa V-6? It isn't a V-6.  It's a 
> staggered straight-six.  It has balanced dynamics and an even firing 
> gap.  That's why it sounds like a straight-six, and doesn't have that 
> funny warble that other V-6s have.)  By contrast, the Chrysler V-10 is 
> a clumsy, inelegant design.  It's unbalanced in its base state, and 
> can only be balanced using active balancers that consume power. It has 
> a massive valve gear that can only work up to a rather low rpm, and so 
> it can only generate significant power with huge displacement.  None 
> of that is found in Alfa's designs.  The V-10 is unworthy of bearing 
> the Alfa name.
>
> I think you can find the same kind of soul in Alfa's suspension 
> designs. Again, you see the smart, elegant solutions that are found in 
> the engines. Alfa's original rear end designs could easily be 
> considered pedestrian by many.  But their light weight and lateral 
> fixing made them high performance designs to be sure.  Even with a 
> solid rear axle, nothing handles like and Alfa.  When Alfa decided to 
> make a new suspension design, for the Alfetta, they used a super low 
> mass torsion bar setup for the front, and a De Dion design for the 
> rear that combines the best aspects of solid axle and independent 
> suspension together in one package.  There is a definite soul in 
> Alfa's suspension designs, too.
>
> You see this same kind of soul in other marques.  I worked my way 
> through high school and college as a Honda motorcycle mechanic.  The 
> Honda engine designs up through about 1984 had a definite soul to 
> them.  All of us who worked on them recognized it.  And we all agreed 
> that it disappeared around 1984, to be replaced by a different style 
> and different thinking.
>
> There is an intangible *something* that makes an Alfa an Alfa.  And I 
> would argue that it's neither the badge nor the bodywork.
--
to be removed from alfa, see http://www.digest.net/bin/digest-subs.cgi
or email "unsubscribe alfa" to [email protected]

Reply via email to