El Martes, 29 de Agosto de 2006 15:44, George Boudreau escribió:
> Manuel,
>
> The new makefile scheme will be delayed for a while. After I ran the
> ICA tests last night I found the shell path, /tools/bin/sh, was hard
> coded into many scripts. (This is not right)
For LFS, that sha-bang is used in 062-creatingdirs and 063-createfiles. Both
must be run from inside the chroot and there is no /bin/{bash,sh} until after
063-createfiles run.
What is the issue you found due using /tools/bin/sh on that two scripts?
> Problems still remain as I see references to
> /tools/lib/gcc.....(debug symbols) inside the executables. I am trying
> to find out if these artifacts also exist in the original code (1.0).
> This may be normal as I did not see any comments in the lists..
If that /tools/lib/gcc..... aren't found in a 1.0 run (it should not be here,
i think) then maybe the issue it that the shell used to run the chroot build
step isn't actually using +h.
Well, now trunk and experimental are sync. Fell free to commit that changes
and don't worry breaking the branch.
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info
TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
