Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 8/29/06, George Boudreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> This definitely happens for binaries created before the final gcc. Do
> you see it on all the binaries, even after gcc has been installed?
.. I cannot say 100% of binaries are this way but way too many are.
For instance, /bin/ls from coreutils should not reference the gcc in
/tools in any way. What do you see there?
I have a CLFS2 build running at the moment and unfortunately I don't
have the old LFS binaries kicking around.
I had run readelf -a against a binary (don't remember which one)and
saw no references to /tools/... but a grep of the file returned a few.
If someone has 'unstripped' binaries _not_ built with jhalfs they
would be the best place to start.
--
Dan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
