Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 8/29/06, George Boudreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(Who knew ICA was so useful)
Another person sees the light! It's a steep slope to climb to get set
up, but it's a kick ass debugging tool for building software.
..It has been a while since I used it on Greg's DIY-Linux scripts.
Problems still remain as I see references to
/tools/lib/gcc.....(debug symbols) inside the executables. I am trying
to find out if these artifacts also exist in the original code (1.0).
This may be normal as I did not see any comments in the lists..
This definitely happens for binaries created before the final gcc. Do
you see it on all the binaries, even after gcc has been installed?
.. I cannot say 100% of binaries are this way but way too many are.
Alas, I've been doing the ICA runs the same way as Greg, which is to
strip off all the debugging symbols before comparison. After stripping
the debugging symbols, they should be identical.
.. yes, strip the symbols and they are alike. The issue I have: is
this a product of the jhalfs scripting or a natural occurrence.
--
Dan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
