if that is the case as u say, then wont it be 3+ 4+ 5 when x +3 initially?..and then x increments by one later due to the single post increment
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 10:15 AM, sagar pareek <[email protected]>wrote: > nope compiler read it from left to right > > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Arun Vishwanathan < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> @sagar: if what u said previously holds as in when u say y=x++ + ++x is >> evaluated as 4+4 since ++x results in 4 and 4 is used in x++ too (cos post >> increment increments x later) then for y=x++ + ++x + ++x with x beginning as >> 3 shud the expression not be evaluated as 5+5+4( from rhs ++x does a 3 to 4 >> and another ++x does 4 to 5 and 5 is used in x++) .later x becomes 6 ? >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 2:39 PM, sagar pareek <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> sorry for above...typo mistake :- >>> >>> yup >>> but what about this >>> x=3; >>> y= x++ + ++x + ++x; // it is executed as:- >>> >>> during first addition, increase the value of x, now first addition will >>> be 4+4 + ++x; >>> now for second addition it will be like >>> 8+5 >>> hence final value of y=13; >>> do it by urself >>> >>> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 6:09 PM, sagar pareek <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> yup >>>> but what about this >>>> x=4; >>>> y= x++ + ++x + ++x; // it is executed as:- >>>> >>>> during first addition, increase the value of x, now first addition will >>>> be 4+4 + ++x; >>>> now for second addition it will be like >>>> 8+5 >>>> hence final value of y=13; >>>> do it by urself >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 2:54 PM, shady <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> @sagar >>>>> would it get evaluated like this ? >>>>> supposing x = 3; >>>>> >>>>> y = x++ + ++x; becomes y = (x=x+1) + (x=x+1); >>>>> then x=x+1; >>>>> >>>>> so x = 5, y = 8; >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sagar pareek >>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> @Venga >>>>>> if u are doing this >>>>>> y= x++ + ++x; //x=3 >>>>>> then it would be >>>>>> like that :- >>>>>> ++x; //x=4 >>>>>> y=x+x; >>>>>> x++; >>>>>> >>>>>> i thing this is sufficient :) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Interstellar Overdrive < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The expression y = x++ + x++ + ++y; is not a valid one. The result >>>>>>> is compiler dependent >>>>>>> Read this for reference :http://c-faq.com/expr/seqpoints.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. >>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/algogeeks/-/-DWyCxlftwgJ. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> **Regards >>>>>> SAGAR PAREEK >>>>>> COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING >>>>>> NIT ALLAHABAD >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> **Regards >>>> SAGAR PAREEK >>>> COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING >>>> NIT ALLAHABAD >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> **Regards >>> SAGAR PAREEK >>> COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING >>> NIT ALLAHABAD >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Algorithm Geeks" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Arun Vish >> Graduate Student >> Department of Computer Science >> University of Southern California >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Algorithm Geeks" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > **Regards > SAGAR PAREEK > COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING > NIT ALLAHABAD > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. > -- Arun Vish Graduate Student Department of Computer Science University of Southern California -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
