*x= 3 initially On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Arun Vishwanathan <[email protected]>wrote:
> if that is the case as u say, then wont it be 3+ 4+ 5 when x +3 > initially?..and then x increments by one later due to the single post > increment > > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 10:15 AM, sagar pareek <[email protected]>wrote: > >> nope compiler read it from left to right >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Arun Vishwanathan < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> @sagar: if what u said previously holds as in when u say y=x++ + ++x is >>> evaluated as 4+4 since ++x results in 4 and 4 is used in x++ too (cos post >>> increment increments x later) then for y=x++ + ++x + ++x with x beginning as >>> 3 shud the expression not be evaluated as 5+5+4( from rhs ++x does a 3 to 4 >>> and another ++x does 4 to 5 and 5 is used in x++) .later x becomes 6 ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 2:39 PM, sagar pareek <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> sorry for above...typo mistake :- >>>> >>>> yup >>>> but what about this >>>> x=3; >>>> y= x++ + ++x + ++x; // it is executed as:- >>>> >>>> during first addition, increase the value of x, now first addition will >>>> be 4+4 + ++x; >>>> now for second addition it will be like >>>> 8+5 >>>> hence final value of y=13; >>>> do it by urself >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 6:09 PM, sagar pareek <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> yup >>>>> but what about this >>>>> x=4; >>>>> y= x++ + ++x + ++x; // it is executed as:- >>>>> >>>>> during first addition, increase the value of x, now first addition will >>>>> be 4+4 + ++x; >>>>> now for second addition it will be like >>>>> 8+5 >>>>> hence final value of y=13; >>>>> do it by urself >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 2:54 PM, shady <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> @sagar >>>>>> would it get evaluated like this ? >>>>>> supposing x = 3; >>>>>> >>>>>> y = x++ + ++x; becomes y = (x=x+1) + (x=x+1); >>>>>> then x=x+1; >>>>>> >>>>>> so x = 5, y = 8; >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sagar pareek >>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> @Venga >>>>>>> if u are doing this >>>>>>> y= x++ + ++x; //x=3 >>>>>>> then it would be >>>>>>> like that :- >>>>>>> ++x; //x=4 >>>>>>> y=x+x; >>>>>>> x++; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> i thing this is sufficient :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Interstellar Overdrive < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The expression y = x++ + x++ + ++y; is not a valid one. The result >>>>>>>> is compiler dependent >>>>>>>> Read this for reference :http://c-faq.com/expr/seqpoints.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>> Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. >>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/algogeeks/-/-DWyCxlftwgJ. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> **Regards >>>>>>> SAGAR PAREEK >>>>>>> COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING >>>>>>> NIT ALLAHABAD >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> **Regards >>>>> SAGAR PAREEK >>>>> COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING >>>>> NIT ALLAHABAD >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> **Regards >>>> SAGAR PAREEK >>>> COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING >>>> NIT ALLAHABAD >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Arun Vish >>> Graduate Student >>> Department of Computer Science >>> University of Southern California >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Algorithm Geeks" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> **Regards >> SAGAR PAREEK >> COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING >> NIT ALLAHABAD >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Algorithm Geeks" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > Arun Vish > Graduate Student > Department of Computer Science > University of Southern California > > -- Arun Vish Graduate Student Department of Computer Science University of Southern California -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
