To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 31 05:29:20 -0800 2006 ------- I think most of the LD_LIBRARY_PATH stuff is only still there because nobody dares to remove it from the soffice launch script ;-), the only exception being javaldx which needs to be there as long as there are so many java installations without proper RUNPATH out there. The problem with javaldx in this scenario is that - in theory - each user could use his favorite Java version, rendering symbolic links in the program directory more dangerous than useful. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
