To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76653
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 2 12:15:56 +0000
2007 -------
So, it seems gcc (at least the g++ 3.4.1 I tested) is not as clever as it could
be: While
---8<---
static void * myPointer1;
void * myFunction1() { return myPointer1; }
---8<---
produces no .ctor section,
---8<---
struct MyStruct {
void * pointer;
MyStruct(): pointer(0) {}
};
static MyStruct myPointer2;
void * myFunction2() { return myPointer2.pointer; }
---8<---
does produce a .ctor section to (redundantly) call the MyStruct ctor for
myPointer2. Maybe it would be better to improve gcc than to complicate the OOo
code base.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
