Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Abramo Bagnara wrote: > > > > > I have to partially disagree, nothing inhibits to do: > > > > frames = buffer_size; > > snd_pcm_mmap_begin(pcm, areas, &offset, &frames); > > > > and then reduce the number of frames to call snd_pcm_mmap_commit with. > > > > Perhaps it's useless, but this is how I designed this API. > > Yes, while we have the mmap_begin function limiting the transfer count and > application knows how many samples should be filled, the reducing the > counf of channel is really not necessary. I think that it would be better > to avoid to do this by programmers, because we can use the mmap_commit > size count for some internal purposes (a temporary buffer for frames > freeing etc..) in future. It's not really any pain from the developer > view, but if you don't agree with my, I'm ready to change your (or > me?) comment for the mmap_commit function.
I agree with you. My proposal is to leave your comment unless someone is capable to show us a valid reason to need to further reduce number of frames commited. -- Abramo Bagnara mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Opera Unica Phone: +39.546.656023 Via Emilia Interna, 140 48014 Castel Bolognese (RA) - Italy ALSA project http://www.alsa-project.org It sounds good! _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
