Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > > > what many people (all except Abramo IIRC) agreed to in the discussions > > > on LAD was that in order to have ALSA provide an API that worked this > > > way, you'd basically be completely hiding almost all of ALSA. So much > > > so that making it part of the ALSA API is sort of beside the > > > point. > > > > Paul, you're becoming to worry me... You're seeing confirmations of your > > ideas here and there, where these does not exists. > > > > The discussion on LAD was essentially between you and me and almost no > > other message pro/con your/my proposals was sent. > > > > After that some proposals have been sent (my soundboxes, your > > laaga/jack, another proposal from Richard and other). > > > > Very little feedback has been given and nobody else has exited this > > discussion convinced for a model or another. > > Ahem, _nobody_?
I've said *almost* nobody (and note this is only a quantity consideration and definitely not a worth one) -- Abramo Bagnara mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Opera Unica Phone: +39.546.656023 Via Emilia Interna, 140 48014 Castel Bolognese (RA) - Italy ALSA project http://www.alsa-project.org It sounds good! _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
