Paul Davis wrote: > > so do you feel absolutely comfortable in asserting that for all the > hardware that both OSS and ALSA support, ALSA's support is more or > less as good as the OSS code? i just worry that people who don't want > to see this change will argue that ALSA must get all of its low level > drivers into the "as good or better than" state first before the merge > with the kernel tree occurs ...
Strip off the drivers that don't work and fix those in later versions. I think ALSA would be marked as experimental anyway. I have just seen too many projects in endless development/rewrite cycle and then die without ever getting to first release because of perfectionism. If Linux would have been ALSA we would still use kernel version 0.9... ;) I think most important thing is to get API to fixed state and indicate it by making official "release" so that developers really start using it. To prove ALSA concept you need one stable API (that don't change every six months) and one stable driver. - Jussi Laako -- PGP key fingerprint: 161D 6FED 6A92 39E2 EB5B 39DD A4DE 63EB C216 1E4B Available at PGP keyservers _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
