At Mon, 23 Jun 2003 18:46:35 +0200,
Marcus Andersson wrote:
> 
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > 
> > hmm, i have no problem at all for compiling.  what problem do you
> > have?
> 
> True, I don't know what the current CVS status is.
> 
> > except for known compiler-check problem in the configure script, i've
> > not heard much about it.  at least, not reported to alsa-devel ML.
> > (a few days ago, there was a missing file, but it was already fixed.)
> 
> Then this probably hit me the last time I tried to update. The problem
> with alsa cvs is that, according to my experience, more often than not
> it will not compile. This makes me think twice before I update my tree.
> Developers should make an effort and check their code an extra time,
> because a mistake affects so many.

yeah, that's true.

however, the most case in which the compilation breaks is a missing
check-in of some files (just like above).  and it's difficult to fix,
because forgetfulness is a nature of human being :)

such a problem may be reduced if we go to bitkeeper.
(or, even subvesion would help much in this regard?)


ciao,

Takashi


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel

Reply via email to