At Mon, 23 Jun 2003 18:46:35 +0200, Marcus Andersson wrote: > > Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > hmm, i have no problem at all for compiling. what problem do you > > have? > > True, I don't know what the current CVS status is. > > > except for known compiler-check problem in the configure script, i've > > not heard much about it. at least, not reported to alsa-devel ML. > > (a few days ago, there was a missing file, but it was already fixed.) > > Then this probably hit me the last time I tried to update. The problem > with alsa cvs is that, according to my experience, more often than not > it will not compile. This makes me think twice before I update my tree. > Developers should make an effort and check their code an extra time, > because a mistake affects so many.
yeah, that's true. however, the most case in which the compilation breaks is a missing check-in of some files (just like above). and it's difficult to fix, because forgetfulness is a nature of human being :) such a problem may be reduced if we go to bitkeeper. (or, even subvesion would help much in this regard?) ciao, Takashi ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel