On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > From: Jason Clouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On 2004-01-17 06:00:20 -0600 Stephen Stocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Elitist? My apologies if that's how I sounded. > > That's what I took away from your comments. But if that's not what > you intended, then the apologies are all mine.
No need, I think I often come across as representing my opinions as fact. > > Of course it can be improved! > > Then we're in agreement. Yep! I often find joy in getting something to work the way it was intended after long hours scratching my head, but I'm the first to say that it can also be incredibly frustrating at times! > > I'm not going to comment further on this topic, everyone has a > > preference and > > the choice to use whatever suits them. Considering that ALSA is a > > Linux > > system, I assume that most people using it prefer Linux. > > I agree. But my point wasn't that Linux should be turned into > something else. It's about making Linux mop the floor with everything > else. Right now, ALSA looks like a good start. I just suggested some > moves that would move it closer to being superior. *This* is an attitude we could use a lot more of, and my apologies for misreading your point. I think we'll get there eventually. My biggest wish is that I could contribute to the Wiki, it's been a help to me. But my greatest knowledge came from several months of trying to get an upgrade to work on my old SB16, only to find I had a screwed-up modules.conf from an earlier version. :) Take care, Steve ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Alsa-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user
