TFS and it's nanny checkout system has annoyed me for the last time, so I
was hoping to solicit some feedback from other's who might have moved away
from centralized revision control system to a DRCS like Git or Mercurial.
Our development team has experience with both Git and Hg, but for non .NET
development. I worry about how well these two play with Visual Studio; I
suspect without some sort of VS integration it'll be harder to use than TFS
especially for renames.
1. For .NET development with VS 2010, which works better, Git or Hg?
Why?
2. Do you use any source control plugins to VS? Which one?
3. When moving from a centralized version control system to a distributed
one, what are some things to watch out for?
Thanks in advance,
-Shawn
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.
