If you have the budget and decide to use git, I would look at using github.com as well. It makes git much more accessible.
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Shawn Neal <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks everyone. So it sounds like > > There are Git/Hg plugins for VS, but everyone uses the command > line/powershell. > Switching to a Git/Hg is well worth the effort. > > Chris - I remember that discussion ;) it's been a while and I was hoping to > get feedback specifically around tooling - which I got, so thanks! > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Justin Rudd <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Nice. Didn't know about gitextensions. But they don't install on my >> Win7/VS2010 host. Anyone got that working successfully? >> >> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Bobby Johnson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Git client with Visual Studio integration: >>> http://code.google.com/p/gitextensions/ >>> Tortoise git is a nice choice as well: >>> http://code.google.com/p/tortoisegit/ >>> >>> But in the end of the day I use msysgit with POSHGit as well. The command >>> line is so much faster, it just has a steeper learning curve. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Justin Rudd <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> 1.) Is impossible to answer objectively. There are no git visual studio >>>> plugins so using either from Visual Studio is completely dependent on which >>>> one you like better. For me, it is bazaar because its rename support is >>>> truly rename (not a remove than add), and it supports versioning >>>> directories >>>> (which I have found quite handy). But if I was picking between git and >>>> mercurial, I'd use mercurial but only because I have more experience with >>>> Mercurial than git and I find it works better with Windows (git works fine >>>> with Windows just not as cleanly in my opinion). >>>> 2.) Nope. But I tried VisualHg (http://visualhg.codeplex.com/). And it >>>> pretty nice. I don't know if all the features are solid, but the "hidden" >>>> ones that I used (rename files, rename directories, etc.) worked without me >>>> having to drop to the command line to fix things up before commit. >>>> 3.) I don't know about git, but with Mercurial securing access to the >>>> repository was hit or miss. We served up the central repository behind an >>>> IIS box. We put ACLs on the repo and sometimes they worked, sometimes they >>>> didn't. Never really debugged it to a root cause... >>>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Shawn Neal <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> TFS and it's nanny checkout system has annoyed me for the last time, so >>>>> I was hoping to solicit some feedback from other's who might have moved >>>>> away >>>>> from centralized revision control system to a DRCS like Git or Mercurial. >>>>> Our development team has experience with both Git and Hg, but for non >>>>> .NET >>>>> development. I worry about how well these two play with Visual Studio; I >>>>> suspect without some sort of VS integration it'll be harder to use than >>>>> TFS >>>>> especially for renames. >>>>> >>>>> For .NET development with VS 2010, which works better, Git or Hg? Why? >>>>> Do you use any source control plugins to VS? Which one? >>>>> When moving from a centralized version control system to a distributed >>>>> one, what are some things to watch out for? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance, >>>>> -Shawn >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Seattle area Alt.Net" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Seattle area Alt.Net" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> "The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be >>> correct." >>> >>> - Occam’s Razor >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_Razor >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Seattle area Alt.Net" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Seattle area Alt.Net" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Seattle area Alt.Net" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Seattle area Alt.Net" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.
