Justifiable annoyance from those who contributed to Reflector while it
was free aside, it's definitely worth $35 bucks.

This thread is turning into a great resource on cool stuff to do with
Reflector.

On Feb 2, 3:48 pm, "Ted Neward" <[email protected]> wrote:
> And of course, the irony of this conversation today is the announcement from
> RedGate that Reflector is no longer free.
>
> Ted Neward
>
> Java, .NET, XML Services
>
> Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
>
> http://www.tedneward.com
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Ryan Riley
> Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 2:07 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: I don't use .Net Reflector (be gentle)
>
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Justin Bozonier <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> So a couple people now are surprised.. nay, shocked that I don't use
> Reflector and I'm pretty sure that means I would have more ninjitsu if
> I did. What problems are you guys solving with it?
>
> I've mostly used it to look at the Rx assemblies since the docs are so
> empty. I also recently used it to discover that StreamWriter actually
> closes/disposes the underlying stream. Ugh.
>
> Ryan
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group 
> athttp://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.

Reply via email to