On 3/27/09 9:49 AM, "Vijay Gurbani" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Y. R. Yang wrote:
>> First I should say that I still do not understand the diagram. I can infer
>> the intention of 1 and 3, but not the other two:
>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/09mar/slides/alto-10.pdf
>>
>> Which one represents P4P/Info Export? Any elaboration?
>
> Ellipse 2 was the P4P/Infoexport (at least that was the intent, if
> not the delivery.)
Can you elaborate which part of the draft did give you this idea? Reading
the draft I'm not sure from where this idea (Ellipse 2 only) can be derived
since it seems clear that is not the case given the different queries
explained.
Anyway, that does not reflect the merged protocol in its current form since
it can provide all the functionality described (all ellipses) including
negotiation through service descriptors.
>
>> To be honest, I should say that the image did create an image of
>> conflicting possibilities in my mind and may not represent real protocols,
>> which can support multiple possibilities.
>
> But regardless, the diagram of the chairs was not normative ;-)
Right, but the diagram could have been circulated days before the meeting so
that feedback could be sent and any doubts tackled. A lot of the confusion
on the meeting sparked from that diagram.
It
> was mainly a vehicle to get involved actors in direct talks towards
> consensus on a path to a protocol. In that, I think it may have
> succeeded.
>
> Thanks,
>
> - vijay
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
