On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Vijay Gurbani <[email protected]> wrote: > the diagram of the chairs [...] > was mainly a vehicle to get involved actors in direct talks towards > consensus on a path to a protocol.
Vijay, You put up a war slide where there was no war, claiming disagreement where there was none. This has the effect diametrically opposed to building consensus. > In that, I think it may have succeeded. Interested parties were talking directly before and after the botched second ALTO session. It didn't succeed in creating a direct conversation, it failed in stopping it. -- Stanislav Shalunov BitTorrent Inc [email protected] personal: http://shlang.com _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
