On 10/28/2013 10:50 PM, Y. Richard Yang wrote:
It looks like that the draft is still evolving. I can see several
possibilities in defining network maps: one is the geo-location already
well defined in the draft; Table 5 of the
Technical-Appendix-feb-2013.pdf suggests that many maps can be
constructed. This is interesting and also shows that we will need to
think more on how to handle a wealth of such information. Good work!
Richard: Indeed; we forsee multiple maps coming out from this data once
the approximate locations of the devices has been determined (which is
what Section 6 of the draft is all about).
Some of these maps are fairly esoteric and some of the work we are doing
looks at various "what if" scenarios using the maps we have constructed.
We plan to publish these evolutions as our thinking further coalesces.
Let's chat more in Vancouver.
Thanks,
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected]
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
