On 29 Jun 2016, at 0:59, joel jaeggli wrote:
On 6/28/16 7:48 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-alto-deployments-15: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-deployments/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's a 2 day old (at the time of this writing) IPR disclosure. It
seems rather unusual, and I am not sure of the intent.
they are third party ipr declarations and they are in fact the product
of reviewing the document:
from the review of [email protected] Carlos Pignataro.
Major:
1. I came across two patent applications in which the examiners add
this
document as a non-patent citation. The document has no IPR
disclosures,
and authors seem to have responded to IPR calls.
There lies my confusion. Why would a patent application that cites this
document cause an IPR disclosure against this document? Seems backwards
to me.
I will submit 3rd party disclosures for these now, there may be more:
http://www.google.com/patents/EP2913979A1#npl-citations
http://www.google.com/patents/WO2016039798A1#npl-citations
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
