On 06/29/2016 01:22 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
On 6/28/16 11:14 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
There lies my confusion. Why would a patent application that cites this
document cause an IPR disclosure against this document? Seems backwards
to me.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3979#page-9
6.1.3. IPR of Others
If a person has information about IPR that may Cover IETF
Contributions, but the participant is not required to disclose
because they do not meet the criteria in Section 6.6 (e.g., the IPR
is owned by some other company), such person is encouraged to notify
the IETF by sending an email message to [email protected]. Such a
notice should be sent as soon as reasonably possible after the person
realizes the connection.
As the WG co-chair and document shephered ... so, what is the expected
process to relieve the burden of such IPR declarations and move the work
ahead? I scanned rfc3979 but did not find any advisory text related to
such third-party IPR notifications.
Thanks,
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Nokia Networks
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: [email protected] / [email protected]
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
