On 6/29/16 9:28 AM, Ben Campbell wrote: > On 29 Jun 2016, at 10:57, joel jaeggli wrote: > >> On 6/29/16 8:14 AM, Ben Campbell wrote: >>> On 29 Jun 2016, at 10:08, Ben Campbell wrote: >>> >>>> On 29 Jun 2016, at 1:22, joel jaeggli wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6/28/16 11:14 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: >>>>>> On 29 Jun 2016, at 0:59, joel jaeggli wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/28/16 7:48 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: >>>>>>>> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for >>>>>>>> draft-ietf-alto-deployments-15: No Objection >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply >>>>>>>> to all >>>>>>>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut >>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>> introductory paragraph, however.) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please refer to >>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >>>>>>>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >>>>>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-deployments/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> COMMENT: >>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There's a 2 day old (at the time of this writing) IPR >>>>>>>> disclosure. It >>>>>>>> seems rather unusual, and I am not sure of the intent. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> they are third party ipr declarations and they are in fact the >>>>>>> product >>>>>>> of reviewing the document: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> from the review of [email protected] Carlos Pignataro. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Major: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1. I came across two patent applications in which the examiners add >>>>>>> this >>>>>>> document as a non-patent citation. The document has no IPR >>>>>>> disclosures, >>>>>>> and authors seem to have responded to IPR calls. >>>>>> >>>>>> There lies my confusion. Why would a patent application that cites >>>>>> this >>>>>> document cause an IPR disclosure against this document? Seems >>>>>> backwards >>>>>> to me. >>>>> >>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3979#page-9 >>>>> >>>>> 6.1.3. IPR of Others >>>>> >>>>> If a person has information about IPR that may Cover IETF >>>>> Contributions, but the participant is not required to disclose >>>>> because they do not meet the criteria in Section 6.6 (e.g., the IPR >>>>> is owned by some other company), such person is encouraged to >>>>> notify >>>>> the IETF by sending an email message to [email protected]. Such a >>>>> notice should be sent as soon as reasonably possible after the >>>>> person >>>>> realizes the connection. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Sorry, my confusion is not the fact this is a 3rd party disclosure. >>>> It's more that the fact being disclosed seems to be that a third party >>>> patent application cites this document. Maybe I am misreading >>>> something, but based strictly on the information in the disclosure, >>>> that doesn't seem to imply a third party has IPR that may encumber the >>>> draft; rather it seem to imply that may build on top of this draft. >>> >>> grumble. I can't seem to type this morning. >>> >>> s/... imply that may build.../... imply that the IPR may build... >> >> It's not our job to judge the validity or applicability of ipr claims on >> material. >> >> You can draw your own conclusions as an individual. >> >> I think it's responsible of the person engaging in third party >> disclosure to have done so. that's about the only conclusion I would >> draw. >> >> > > I wasn't trying to judge the applicability so much as the intent, but I > take your point. My real concern at this point is that the working group > has the opportunity to decide how to proceed.
yeah, I think that applies to any form of late breaking change of significance. > >>>> >>>> >>>> That all being said, this disclosure came in after IETF last call. I'd >>>> be very surprised if the working group was aware of it when they >>>> progressed the draft. >>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I will submit 3rd party disclosures for these now, there may be >>>>>>> more: >>>>>>> http://www.google.com/patents/EP2913979A1#npl-citations >>>>>>> http://www.google.com/patents/WO2016039798A1#npl-citations >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
