Hi Kai, Thank you so much for your feedback. These issues will be addressed in the next revisions. Best regards, Sabine
From: Kai GAO <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 7:40 AM To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) <[email protected]> Cc: IETF ALTO <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [alto] Second WGLC of draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar (version -12) Hi Sabine and all, I reviewed the diff between -11 and -12. The changes generally look good but I spotted some minor issues: - Title of Section 3.1: resources -> resource or resource's. - In the first sentence of the last paragraph in section 2.4, the term "cost Calendar" should be capitalized. - In Section 4.1 and Section 5, some contents are using "ALTO client" instead of "ALTO Client". Best, Kai On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 11:51 AM Jensen Zhang <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi all, I reviewed the whole diff of the cost calendar draft between version -11 and version -12. The modification looks good to me. I only have one small suggestion: In the new section 2.1 "Terminology": o Calendar, Cost Calendar: When used with a capital "C", these terms refer to an ALTO Cost Calendar. 'with a capital "C"' may be confusing here. Because the first letters of both "Cost" and "Calendar" are 'C'. People may think "Cost calendar" is also a term. Maybe "with capitalized words" is better? Thanks, Jensen On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 3:10 PM Vijay Gurbani <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: One major correction: s/The current WGLC will be open until Jul-12-2019/The current WGLC will be open until Jul-21-2019/ The current WGLC will proceed until Jul-21-2019. Thanks. On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 1:53 PM Vijay Gurbani <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: All: The chairs will like to start a second WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-12 [0]. During the first WGLC, a couple of discusses were raised as documented in [1]. More specifically, 1/ Ben indicated a couple of edge cases that need to be resolved. 2/ Alvaro noted that there is IPR tied to the precursor of this draft, as detailed in [2]. The chairs will like to ensure that the WG is aware of the IPR declaration inherited by draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar, and duly considers it during the second WGLC. Version -12 of the document (the one being WGLC'd) addresses the IESG discusses and comments, as well as a review by one of the chairs (Vijay). The current WGLC will be open until Jul-12-2019 (the start of the IETF week). Please post your comments on this draft to the WG mailing list, even if the comment is simply to say that you support (or not) moving this work ahead. The chairs will summarize the status of the draft at the end of WGLC period. [0] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-12 [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar/ballot/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar Thank you. - vijay _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
