Hi Danny,

Thanks for your review and comments. Sabine and I are working on the next
revision. We will address all the issues in the next revision.

And for your additional comment, actually, the "ip-pid-property-map"
resource in IRD is an example of Aggregated Entity Domain. Sec 9.7 should
illustrate it. But you are right, the current example in Sec 9.7 does not
show the benefit of Aggregated Entity Domain. I will also revise this
example in the next revision.

Looking forward to your further comments.

Thanks,
Jensen


On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 9:50 AM Danny Alex Lachos Perez <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Sabine,
>
> I have a quick additional comment:
>
> I believe that an example (sec. 9) of Aggregated Entity Domain is missing..
> Perhaps you could re-use (or extend) the IRD example [0] and try to add a
> couple of sentences to indicate equivalent entity property mappings (see
> slide 17, 18 in [1]).
>
> Best regards,
>
> Danny Lachos
> [0]
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-09#page-28
> [1]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/slides-105-alto-unified-properties-for-the-alto-protocol-02.pdf
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 10:42 AM Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia -
> FR/Paris-Saclay) <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Danny,
>>
>>
>>
>> Many thanks for your review. I saw your last comment is in Section 9.7.
>>
>> Should we consider that until section 9.7 your review is complete or will
>> you have more questions?
>>
>> We look forward to your other comments,
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Sabine
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* alto <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Danny Alex Lachos
>> Perez
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 17, 2019 8:28 PM
>> *To:* IETF ALTO <[email protected]>
>> *Cc:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [alto] I-D Action:
>> draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-09..txt
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear authors,
>>
>>
>>
>> I started to read the “*Unified Properties for the ALTO Protocol*” draft
>> (-09).
>>
>>
>>
>> Please, see my first comments in the attached file (search for
>> '[DANNY]').
>>
>> Many of them are suggestions about clarity and format issues .
>>
>>
>>
>> I will continue the review and send additional comments in a short time.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Danny Lachos
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 10:41 AM <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the Application-Layer Traffic Optimization
>> WG of the IETF.
>>
>>         Title           : Unified Properties for the ALTO Protocol
>>         Authors         : Wendy Roome
>>                           Sabine Randriamasy
>>                           Y. Richard Yang
>>                           Jingxuan Jensen Zhang
>>                           Kai Gao
>>         Filename        : draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-09.txt
>>         Pages           : 43
>>         Date            : 2019-09-04
>>
>> Abstract:
>>    This document extends the Application-Layer Traffic Optimization
>>    (ALTO) Protocol [RFC7285] by generalizing the concept of "endpoint
>>    properties" to generic types of entities, and by presenting those
>>    properties as maps, similar to the network and cost maps in
>>    [RFC7285].
>>
>>
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new/
>>
>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-09
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-09
>>
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-09
>>
>>
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>> submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp..ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>> <ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> alto mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

Reply via email to