Hi Jordi / all,
I reviewed this draft at revision -05 and had quite a pile of comments. Looking at -08, I think all my comments were addressed. My relatively quick read through of the current revision found no issues and so I think the document is now ready to move forward. Note that idnits observes that RFC 7971 is an unused reference. Cheers, Adrian From: alto <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jordi Ros Giralt Sent: 17 May 2023 06:41 To: [email protected] Subject: [alto] Call for volunteers to review 2nd WGLC for ALTO docs Hi ALTO WG: As you know, we are in the process of issuing the 2nd WGLC for two of the ALTO drafts (New Transport and OAM). Thank you to all of you who have been working hard to help get these documents completed, including all the detailed feedback provided by reviewers during the first WGLC. There is now a need (as mentioned by the chairs) to have as many eyes & volunteers review the docs to make sure they are in the best possible shape. I can volunteer to review both documents. Richard also volunteered, thank you Richard. We would like to suggest targeting two more volunteers. Could any of you help support this work? We are targeting 22/05 to complete this new round of revisions, as that's the target day for the 2nd WGLC. These are the docs: - New Transport: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-new-transport/ - OAM: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang/ Please feel free to forward this email if you know others (inside or ouside ALTO) who can help review the docs too. As we are working to wrap up the current charter, this is very important work to ensure the quality of the documents produced by ALTO. Thank you for your collaboration. Jordi, on behalf of ALTO
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
