Hi Jensen, all On this one : use draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis instead of RFC6991
I suggest we leave RFC6991 as in the current version and adjust in the future if the bis makes it before this one (which is not unlikely but who knows). Thanks. Cheers, Med De : alto <[email protected]> De la part de Jensen Zhang Envoyé : mardi 23 mai 2023 15:10 À : [email protected] Cc : [email protected] Objet : Re: [alto] draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang : Call for volunteers to review 2nd WGLC for ALTO docs Hi Adrian, Many thanks for your early review and quick comments. On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 6:41 AM Adrian Farrel <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, I looked at revision -07 This is a really big document and would probably benefit from a more detailed review than I was able to give it. But it looks fine and ready to progress to me. A couple of nits… Section 4.3 might usefully describe that this is an additional requirement. Although we have mentioned this in the subsection title, we will also describe this in the text. You might reference draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis instead of RFC6991. You’ll be behind it in the queue, so you can safely use it as a normative reference. That’ll be a bit more future-proof. Many thanks for the reminder. We will update the reference. Thanks, Jensen Cheers, Adrian From: alto <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of Jordi Ros Giralt Sent: 17 May 2023 06:41 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [alto] Call for volunteers to review 2nd WGLC for ALTO docs Hi ALTO WG: As you know, we are in the process of issuing the 2nd WGLC for two of the ALTO drafts (New Transport and OAM). Thank you to all of you who have been working hard to help get these documents completed, including all the detailed feedback provided by reviewers during the first WGLC. There is now a need (as mentioned by the chairs) to have as many eyes & volunteers review the docs to make sure they are in the best possible shape. I can volunteer to review both documents. Richard also volunteered, thank you Richard. We would like to suggest targeting two more volunteers. Could any of you help support this work? We are targeting 22/05 to complete this new round of revisions, as that's the target day for the 2nd WGLC. These are the docs: - New Transport: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-new-transport/ - OAM: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang/ Please feel free to forward this email if you know others (inside or ouside ALTO) who can help review the docs too. As we are working to wrap up the current charter, this is very important work to ensure the quality of the documents produced by ALTO. Thank you for your collaboration. Jordi, on behalf of ALTO _______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
