George Shaiffer <[email protected]> writes: > Don't know if they would be stable enough for your measurements, specs > included below
It claims to be using a VC-TCXO with 2.5ppm basic accuracy. The problem is that 2.5ppm at 435 Mhz is 1087 hz. You're not likely to be that far off, but you could be. Even that is close enough for our system to "work", but the closer you are the better the range you can get. My HP 5385A disciplined by a GPS-locked OXCO is 4-5 orders of magnitude better than that this counter, for example. And for less than 2 orders of magnitude more money! ;-) However, let's be real. If I recall correctly, our basic frequency steps defined by the PLL config on the CC1200 for current products are something like 76 hz. So if you have some way to get within 100hz, you're about as good as it's worth trying to be. Bdale
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ altusmetrum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gag.com/mailman/listinfo/altusmetrum
