On Thursday 21 February 2002 09:02 pm, Alan Clegg wrote: >On Thursday 21 February 2002 11:17 am, Tom Van de Wiele wrote: >>I did a amflush and it was done in a couple of secs... it was >> not complete... > >Don't forget that amflush runs in the background, it may not > have really 'finished' when you thought it did. > >AlanC
Yes, I'd forgotten that little tidbit. amflush normally returns to the caller after it issues a message that you can log off now, you'll get mail when I'm done. However an amstatus /config/ will report the flushes progress just fine. -- Cheers, Gene AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M Athlon1600XP@1400mhz 512M 98.6+% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a hillbilly
