I suggested no-reuse instead of upping tapecycle (which I expect would also work) because it covered the case of re-using some tapes and not others. I wasn't sure from the original message whether some tapes would be re-used or not. Your solution is definitely easier if none of the tapes in the rotation will ever be re-used.
> Paul, > If one wanted to store every tape, i.e. never reuse one, is there a > difference between setting each to "no-reuse" after it is written > or setting tapecycle 999999 (some huge number)? >
