We've been working on amanda backups of AFS here, but not using
AFS's backup system.  We found that too painful.  We ended up building
our own dump program that wraps around "vos dump".

It's often said that DUMPER-API is coming, but I've seen nothing to
suggest there's been any recent progress.  Some preliminary work was
done on it a while back but I think it stopped.

I know very little about Coda but I don't see a need for an AFS
backup that produces BSD dump-format output.  We also wanted to be
able to restore AFS dumps into non-AFS filesystems, but we were able
to build a restore program that does this.  It's just a matter of
being able to decode the "vos dump" format.

-Mitch


On 11 Jul 2002, Greg Troxel wrote:

> Search the archives and google.  Previous posters have mentioned
> modified amanda versions that incorporate the afs dump tool.  I am
> only familiar with Coda (www.coda.cs.cmu.edu), which has its own
> backup program.  Basically the idea is to use amanda to transport and
> store the bytestream from the native 'dump' version for the non-ufs
> filesystem.
>
> For various reasons, I use gnu tar to back up Coda.  This loses the
> atomic snapshot that the 'real' backup does, and doesn't back up coda
> metadata (acls), but it works well enough.  With the coming 'DUMPER'
> API, it should be possible to hook in native coda and afs clone/dump
> programs.  I believe the coda folks have a modified amanda that does
> Coda.
>
> <rant> I really wish that the coda and afs backup programs would
> produce a BSD dump-format stream, with the files as files, and
> metadata as files with some funny names (e.g. lots of __, or ^A^F^S),
> so that one could restore them either on the coda/afs filesystems, or
> read them anywhere else.  But this is really orthogonal to amanda
> running sendbackup-coda.c. </rant>
>
>         Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>

Reply via email to