Not to beat a dead horse, but it would be nice to see [amanda-users] in the subject line to make it easier to sort mailing lists.
--- Dave Sherohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 08:41:18AM -0400, Galen > Johnson wrote: > > I've had a thunk regarding the list...would it be > possible to set it up > > so the list actually inserts a 'Reply-To: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > header. This would make it so the default reply > (rather than reply to > > all) goes to the list. This would also make the > archives a bit more > > complete since us lazy users that forget to "reply > to all" would start > > posting the solutions to the list directly (kinda > like having to opt out > > rather than in). > > For a summary of the major arguments on each side of > this holy war, > ask google about "Reply-To Considered Harmful" and > its rebuttal, > "Reply-To Considered Useful". > > My vote, FWIW, is to leave things as they are. I > use a mail client (mutt) > which is smart enough to have a 'reply to list' > function in addition to > the ubiquitous 'reply to sender' and 'reply to all'. > If your client > doesn't support 'reply to list', file a feature > request or switch to > one that does. Don't ask the rest of the world to > compensate for your > software's limitations. > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com
