On Thursday 10 October 2002 10:58, Jerry wrote: >Not to beat a dead horse, but it would be nice to see >[amanda-users] in the subject line to make it easier >to sort mailing lists.
And it doesn't come in that way at your site? If you are subscribed, and its not, then something is seriously mucking with the headers of your incoming mail. >--- Dave Sherohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 08:41:18AM -0400, Galen >> >> Johnson wrote: >> > I've had a thunk regarding the list...would it be >> >> possible to set it up >> >> > so the list actually inserts a 'Reply-To: >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]' >> >> > header. This would make it so the default reply >> >> (rather than reply to >> >> > all) goes to the list. This would also make the >> >> archives a bit more >> >> > complete since us lazy users that forget to "reply >> >> to all" would start >> >> > posting the solutions to the list directly (kinda >> >> like having to opt out >> >> > rather than in). >> >> For a summary of the major arguments on each side of >> this holy war, >> ask google about "Reply-To Considered Harmful" and >> its rebuttal, >> "Reply-To Considered Useful". >> >> My vote, FWIW, is to leave things as they are. I >> use a mail client (mutt) >> which is smart enough to have a 'reply to list' >> function in addition to >> the ubiquitous 'reply to sender' and 'reply to all'. >> If your client >> doesn't support 'reply to list', file a feature >> request or switch to >> one that does. Don't ask the rest of the world to >> compensate for your >> software's limitations. > >__________________________________________________ >Do you Yahoo!? >Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More >http://faith.yahoo.com -- Cheers, Gene AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M Athlon1600XP@1400mhz 512M 99.17% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
