On Thursday 10 October 2002 13:24, Dave Sherohman wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 12:58:09PM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain 
wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Oct 2002 at 12:19pm, Gene Heskett wrote
>>
>> > On Thursday 10 October 2002 10:58, Jerry wrote:
>> > >Not to beat a dead horse, but it would be nice to see
>> > >[amanda-users] in the subject line to make it easier
>> > >to sort mailing lists.
>> >
>> > And it doesn't come in that way at your site? If you are
>> > subscribed, and its not, then something is seriously mucking
>> > with the headers of your incoming mail.
>>
>> Err, it doesn't come in that way here...
>
>Nor here.  Given that I set up this mail server and didn't tell it
> to do any header munging, I suspect that Gene has something
> adding the list name to his subject lines.  A procmail recipe,
> maybe?

No, see my previous couple of posts re this Dave.  I was confusing 
the Subject: line with the To: line.  I use kmail, and a reply all 
button includes the To: lines contents in the outgoing address line 
when used instead of a plain reply, which would go only to you.

Can I plead oldtimers or something?  Blame it on excessive 
birthdays?  OTOH, you won't find too many on a list such as this 
who were born on or before 10/04/34.  Now that I'm somewhat retired 
this past July, I can spend a bit more time trying to help newbies 
which I was once one of.  I am at times, truely one who has been 
there, and done that.  I seem to have had an uncanny ability to be 
at the right time and the right place for unusual things all thru 
my over 50 years of chasing electrons for a living.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP@1400mhz  512M
99.17% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly

Reply via email to