On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 01:32:01PM +0100, Christoph Scheeder wrote: > Hi, > Thanks, but that can't be the problem, because this patch had been applied > *before* the last failing amflush. > And it does not show the described symptoms, amflush is not hanging and > not eating up memory and cpu-cycles, it simply terminates fast without > sending > an e-mail or doing anything it is expected to do. > Noe core-files laying around, it just marks the first matching tape as used > in the database and then terminates. > Any thoughts?
Could you run amflush under a debugger? I would like to know where it crash? Do you have the same problem with 2.4.4b1? Jean-Louis > Christoph > > Jean-Louis Martineau schrieb: > >On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:14:35AM +0100, Christoph Scheeder wrote: > > > >>Hi, > >>i have a problem with an amanda-2.4.3 installation and amflush. > >>Problem > >>multiple amanda-runs went to disk cause of tape-errors. > >>only last run out of 3 shall be flushed to tape. > >>Problem if i tell amflush only to flush run named "C:", for example, > >>amflush does nothing, terminating without sending an e-mail. > >>after that i have to run amcleanup, and in the generated e-mail it tells > >>me > >>there where no files to flush, but the tape in the drive is marked as > >>used. > >>If i move the other dir's out of the holding-area and do an amflush > >>all works fine. > >> > >>AFAIR a similar problem was reported a few month back, but i couldn't find > >>the messages in the mailinglist archives. > > > > > >Read the 'double frees' thread on the amanda-hackers mailing list. > > > >Jean-Louis > -- Jean-Louis Martineau email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Departement IRO, Universite de Montreal C.P. 6128, Succ. CENTRE-VILLE Tel: (514) 343-6111 ext. 3529 Montreal, Canada, H3C 3J7 Fax: (514) 343-5834
