On Saturday 08 February 2003 13:20, Gene Heskett wrote: >On Saturday 08 February 2003 07:27, Christoph Scheeder wrote:
Sheesh, 2 days to echo this message back to me? Somethings not up to snuff here. >[...] > >From Jean-Louis: >>> Do you have the same problem with 2.4.4b1? >> >>this is the main production-server of a customer of us, and i'm a >> bit scared about installing "beta"-software on it, so i haven't >> try'd this yet. If you consider it stable enough for >> production-use i'll try it. >> >>Christoph > >Christoph; I've been building the 2.4.4b1 releases and using them >here, usually within 12 hours of their release on Jean-Louis's >site, with no known problems here, on a redhat8.0 box using a >Seagate/Compaq 4 slot changer. For me, thats 'production use'. > >IMO, amanda is a moving target, getting better all the time, and > its currently at least as stable as any 2.4.2 release ever was. > But that, and a buck twenty five will get you a cuppa most > places. > >Here if it breaks, it hasn't broken a paying client, just me, but >the list will be notified asap too. Would I put it on a clients >machinery? In a heartbeat... > >My $0.02, not adjusted for inflation. :) -- Cheers, Gene AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M Athlon1600XP@1400mhz 512M 99.23% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
