On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 01:27:34PM +0100, Christoph Scheeder wrote: > Hi, > > Jean-Louis Martineau schrieb: > >On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 01:32:01PM +0100, Christoph Scheeder wrote: > > > >>Hi, > >>Thanks, but that can't be the problem, because this patch had been applied > >>*before* the last failing amflush. > >>And it does not show the described symptoms, amflush is not hanging and > >>not eating up memory and cpu-cycles, it simply terminates fast without > >>sending > >>an e-mail or doing anything it is expected to do. > >>Noe core-files laying around, it just marks the first matching tape as > >>used in the database and then terminates. > >>Any thoughts? > > > > > >Could you run amflush under a debugger? I would like to know where it > >crash? > > If you can give me a brief instruction how i'll try it, i've never done > this before, so i don't know how.
$ gdb amflush (gdb) run <config> type 'where' on the gdb prompt when it crash. Send me also the amflush log file. Jean-Louis > > >Do you have the same problem with 2.4.4b1? > > this is the main production-server of a customer of us, and i'm a bit scared > about installing "beta"-software on it, so i haven't try'd this yet. > If you consider it stable enough for production-use i'll try it. I would have released the 2.4.4 stable this week-end if you haven't send this bug report. It is better than 2.4.3. Jean-Louis -- Jean-Louis Martineau email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Departement IRO, Universite de Montreal C.P. 6128, Succ. CENTRE-VILLE Tel: (514) 343-6111 ext. 3529 Montreal, Canada, H3C 3J7 Fax: (514) 343-5834
