Hi Dustin, Doesn't look like it's worked. Now I'm getting the following (before the normal "Not found in archive message comes up" tar: Skipping to next header tar: Archive contains `b\371^h\r%\247\0 \006\212\214' where numeric off_t value expected tar: Archive contains `\211\023\034cQ"\r\004\252\005\300\370' where numeric time_t value expected tar: Archive contains `\227\305&jq\0\033>' where numeric uid_t value expected tar: Archive contains `9\n\342)\236\2255\025' where numeric gid_t value expected tar: Skipping to next header tar: Archive contains `\231K\347)\002\346%\026\3207A\372' where numeric off_t value expected tar: Archive contains `\344\203\0\023 \263(T' where numeric mode_t value expected tar: Archive contains `p\244\267\a\030\034\006G\310\034\3220' where numeric time_t value expected tar: Archive contains `\356\004C\304<7tn' where numeric uid_t value expected tar: Archive contains `\020\030\004\004\224\036R\357' where numeric gid_t value expected tar: Skipping to next header tar: ./datasnap0/design/P1050213.JPG: Not found in archive
Anything else I can try? This is really killing me! Regards, Mark On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 10:02:54AM -0500, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Mark Adams <m...@campbell-lange.net> wrote: > > Great thanks. I'll try this - is this something most people set on as > > part of a normal config? > > It's relatively new, so no, not yet, but if it proves to have lots of > upsides and no significant downsides, then I'm sure it will become > common. > > If this does end up solving your problem, perhaps you could add a > "Troubleshooting" page to the wiki to help others? > > In general, Amanda's interactions with various tar implementations' > quoting and unquoting mechanisms is unspecified and not always > correct. It's something we'd like to address, but will probably not > get to soon -- it's best solved with a completely new approach to > indexing dumps. > > Dustin > > -- > Open Source Storage Engineer > http://www.zmanda.com
