I found a bunch (thousands) of these lines in the dumper.debug a bit ago. I will rerun with auth_debug turned up:
Wed Apr 30 10:31:46 2014: thd-0x9956f0: dumper: warning: sec: conn_read_callback: 16451 bytes for handle 499999 went unclaimed! Wed Apr 30 10:31:46 2014: thd-0x9956f0: dumper: warning: sec: conn_read_callback: 16451 bytes for handle 499999 went unclaimed! Wed Apr 30 10:31:46 2014: thd-0x9956f0: dumper: warning: sec: conn_read_callback: 16451 bytes for handle 499999 went unclaimed! Wed Apr 30 10:31:46 2014: thd-0x9956f0: dumper: warning: sec: conn_read_callback: 16451 bytes for handle 499999 went unclaimed! Wed Apr 30 10:31:46 2014: thd-0x9956f0: dumper: warning: sec: conn_read_callback: 16451 bytes for handle 499999 went unclaimed! Wed Apr 30 10:31:46 2014: thd-0x9956f0: dumper: warning: sec: conn_read_callback: 16451 bytes for handle 499999 went unclaimed! Wed Apr 30 10:31:46 2014: thd-0x9956f0: dumper: warning: sec: conn_read_callback: 16451 bytes for handle 499999 went unclaimed! Wed Apr 30 10:31:46 2014: thd-0x9956f0: dumper: warning: sec: conn_read_callback: 16451 bytes for handle 499999 went unclaimed! 499999 is the DATA stream. On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Jean-Louis Martineau <[email protected] > wrote: > Chaskiel, > > In theory, upgrading client and/or server first should work. In practice, > krb5 is not heavily tested, not to say it is not tested at all, but it have > not changed in many years. > > Add: > debug_auth 9 > in amanda.conf on the server and in /etc/amanda/amanda-client.conf on the > client. > Retry the backup. > > Post the complete dumper-*.debug file from the server and the complete > amandad-*.debug and sendbackup-*.debug files from the client. > > Jean-Louis > > > On 04/30/2014 09:12 AM, Chaskiel Grundman wrote: > >> I have an existing 2.6.0p1/2.6.1p1 setup, and the servers have to be >> moved and rebuilt. We use the kerberos authentication/transport. >> >> I am trying to use amanda 3.3.5 on a rebuilt server, and my first amdump >> run failed. estimates and such ran fine, but none of the dumpers succeeded. >> Should this work, or do the clients have to be upgraded first? Will new >> clients work with the old servers? >> >> FAILURE DUMP SUMMARY: >> xxx.cmu.edu <http://xxx.cmu.edu> VolGroup00/LogVol00 lev 2 FAILED >> [missing size line from sendbackup] >> xxx.cmu.edu <http://xxx.cmu.edu> VolGroup00/LogVol00 lev 2 FAILED >> [cannot read header: got 0 bytes instead of 32768] >> >> header: got 0 bytes instead of 32768] >> xxx.cmu.edu <http://xxx.cmu.edu> imap/lvol0 lev 0 FAILED [missing size >> line from sendbackup] >> xxx.cmu.edu <http://xxx.cmu.edu> imap/lvol0 lev 0 FAILED [cannot read >> header: got 0 bytes instead of 32768] >> >> [...] >> >> >> >> >> FAILED DUMP DETAILS: >> /-- xxx.cmu.edu <http://xxx.cmu.edu> VolGroup00/LogVol00 lev 2 FAILED >> [missing size line from sendbackup] >> >> ? dumper: error [partial line in msgbuf: 338 bytes] >> ? dumper: error [partial line in msgbuf: "`<82>^A<B7>^F >> *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`O^F *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`_^F >> *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B >> ^B^B^A^D`g^F *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`g^F >> *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`_^F *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`^?^F >> *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B >> ^A^D`g^F *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`g^F *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`w^F >> *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`g^F *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`_^F >> *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`g^F *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`_^F >> *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`w^F *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`w^F >> *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`w^F *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`g^F >> *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`O^F *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`O^F >> *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`O^F *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D"] >> ? dumper: strange [missing size line from sendbackup] >> \-------- >> /-- xxx.cmu.edu <http://xxx.cmu.edu> imap/lvol0 lev 0 FAILED [missing >> size line from sendbackup] >> >> ? dumper: error [partial line in msgbuf: 290 bytes] >> ? dumper: error [partial line in msgbuf: "`<82>^A<D7>^F >> *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`g^F *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`_^F >> *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B >> ^B^B^A^D`^?^F *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`g^F >> *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`g^F *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`w^F >> *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B >> ^A^D`g^F *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`_^F *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`g^F >> *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`_^F *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`w^F >> *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`w^F *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`w^F >> *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`g^F *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`O^F >> *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`W^F *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D`O^F >> *<86>H<86><F7>^R^A^B^B^B^A^D"] >> ? dumper: strange [missing size line from sendbackup] >> \-------- >> >> >> The sendbackup debug files on the client seem to be completely normal. >> >> Thanks. >> > >
