On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 03:02:05PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 08:33:42AM -0500, Ned Danieley wrote:
> > 
> > and on the other side of the coin, is there any way to encourage the planner
> > to do more level 0 dumps in a given day?
> > 
> > I occasionally find, often after a kernel update/reboot, that amanda
> > thinks that a large number of DLE are 'new', and fairly quickly moves them 
> > up
> > to level 2. but then the planner leaves them at L2 for days or weeks, at the
> > same time using less than 1 TB of my 2.5 TB tape.
> > 
> > I know that I can force a level 0, but that has to be done on each DLE. it
> > seems like there should be a way to tell just amanda to use a larger
> > fraction of the tape, but I can't figure it out.
> > 
> 
> As an ideal, amanda tries to get consistant size dumps
> each run of amdump.  As an approximation this size can be
> estimated (using post-compression data) as the sum of
> all level 0's divided by the number of runs per dumpcycle
> plus the average daily level 1 sizes.
> 
> So you can get larger runs by three means, get more data
> (bigger level 0's), become more active (bigger level 1's)
> or shorten the dumpcycle (or runs/dumpcycle).

okay, that's what I wanted to know. I'll try shortening the dumpcycle.
thanks

-- 
Ned Danieley (ned.danie...@duke.edu)
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Box 90281, Duke University
Durham, NC  27708   (919) 660-5111

http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2012-02-11/

Reply via email to