(Sorry, I just noticed the separate thread on the topic of Debian package building.)
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 12:36:55 -0600, Charles Curley wrote: > I now get > > -------------------------------------------------- > dh_fixperms -v >> /home/charles/amanda/build/debian/dpkg.log 2>&1 > # fix perms manually > chown -R amandabackup:disk debian/*/var/lib/* > chown: invalid user: ???amandabackup:disk??? > debian/rules:122: recipe for target 'binary-arch' failed > make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1 > dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit status > 2 > charles@amanda:~/amanda$ > -------------------------------------------------- > > I can add those to my script. However, I wonder: the traditional > debian user is backup:backup. Should we not be using that? [...] > > I have a tarball, and four .deb packages. No amanda common package? > The official Debian packages have indeed always used backup:backup, but I believe the zmanda.com-supplied packages have matched the general practice used there of using the "amandabackup" user. See http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Amanda_packages_from_Zmanda_downloads_page Similarly, I believe the amanda-common package is part of the official Debian build but not the zmanda.com build. (What were your four .deb packages? .../packaging/deb/* in the install tree seems to just build "amanda-backup-server" and "amanda-backup-client".) Nathan Nathan ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nathan Stratton Treadway - [email protected] - Mid-Atlantic region Ray Ontko & Co. - Software consulting services - http://www.ontko.com/ GPG Key: http://www.ontko.com/~nathanst/gpg_key.txt ID: 1023D/ECFB6239 Key fingerprint = 6AD8 485E 20B9 5C71 231C 0C32 15F3 ADCD ECFB 6239
