Matt, > We're using round robin MX. ... > I assume since relay1 is the first MX record, more mail goes to > that server.
If they are the same priority MX records, both should be receiving about the same mail rate. With newer versions of bind as a DNS server you have some choices on randomizing/rotating the order of DNS reply records, and it should be doing it by default. > Everything is setup correctly. It just seems > like the relay servers can't handle it. ... > Postfix filters are set to the max. I think our main option is to create > a third relay server... any other ideas? Adding a third looks like a sensible option. Alternative might be to enable graylisting to radically reduce the mail rate. See also the recent thread: "Postfix+Amavisd+Spamassassin+Clamav low performance on 14-host deployment" Mark ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
