I'm using no SARE rule... I already removed all of them.. Here the contents
of my /etc/mail/spamassassin:

# ls -la /etc/mail/spamassassin
total 12336
drwxr-xr-x  2 root root    4096 Oct 20 17:56 .
drwxr-xr-x  4 root root    4096 Oct 18 17:28 ..
-rw-r--r--  1 root root   14284 Sep 20 18:43 antidrug.cf
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 2780668 Sep 22 13:37 blacklist-uri.cf
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 9609019 Sep 22 13:32 blacklist.cf
-rw-r--r--  1 root root  109810 Sep 20 18:44 bogus-virus-warnings.cf
-rw-r--r--  1 root root     890 Sep 20 16:18 init.pre
-rw-r--r--  1 root root    2066 Oct 20 17:56 local.cf
-rw-r--r--  1 root root    4883 Sep 20 18:44 random.cf
-rw-r--r--  1 root root   56238 Sep 20 18:45 tripwire.cf
-rw-r--r--  1 root root    2397 Sep 20 18:45 v310.pre

 Moreover I'm using  the lists installed when I installed SA...

But, I'll wait till the beginning of next week, when the servers will be
really stressed... and so I will comunicate the load average in that case...

Many many thanks,

rocsca


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gary V" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Avoiding spam scan on message originating from my
network/s


> Rocco wrote:
>
> > Infact,
>
> > I have modified the amavid-new configuration... Really, it happens that
the
> > CPU usage is not so high as when amavisd-new scan all the
incoming/outgoing
> > messages... but the load average of last minute of CPU is about 2 (
> > costantly)...
>
> > Consider tha this is not the rush hour... So I think that I have to
remove
> > all the spame rules list that I'm using... At this point I think that
this
> > is feasible beacuse I migrated SA naive db on mysql DBMS and I
instructed
> > bayes DB with the messages of one mailbox already filtered with SA on
the
> > client side...
>
> I will assume you mean "all the SARE rules that I'm using".
>
> > What do you think about?
> > Still many thanks,
> > rocsca
>
> I would wait and see. I personally would not touch anything unless you
> are constantly running at something like 3.5 or more. I'm sure there are
> lots of people who constantly run at this level, but it would be nice
> to have less stress on the system (load average 3 or less).
>
> Gary V
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
> and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
> _______________________________________________
> AMaViS-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
> AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
> AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
AMaViS-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/

Reply via email to